Articles

 THE NEW YORK CONVENTION: AN INTERPLAY OF DOMESTIC LAW AND AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION
 
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ARBITRATION IN AFRICA: ISSUES OF APPLICABLE LAW, African Review of International Law, 1/2024, forthcoming
 
LE RÔLE DU DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ DANS L’ARBITRAGE, Perspectives contentieuses internationales,  vol 1/1, 2024, pp. 94-105
DIP_Arbitrage.pdf
              
Republished in : L’AUTONOMIE DE L’ARBITRAGE, XXVII Annual Congress of the Italian Society for International Law (SIDI) M. Iovane, F.M. Palombino, G. Zarra, L. Marotti D. Pauciulo, A. Stiano, D. Greco (a cura di), L’arbitrato internazionale nell’interazione tra sistemi normativi, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2024
 
THE PRIVATE/PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW DIVIDE: IS IT STILL RELEVANT?,  Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale, 3/2024, 781-787
RDINT_Private_Public_law.pdf
 
ANERKJENNELSE OG FULLBYRDELSE AV UTENLANDSKE VOLDGIFTSAVGJØRELSER: LB-2023-18169 OM STATENS REPRESENTASJON, SANKSJONER OG ORDRE PUBLIC, Tidsskrift for Forretningsjus 2024, pp. 58-74
anerkjennelse-og-fullbyrdelse-av-utenlandske-voldgiftsavgj%C3%B8relser.pdf
 
EMERGING RELOCALIZATION AND ITS APPARENTLY INCONSISTENT IMPACT ON ARBITRATION, in NYU’s Journal of International Law and Politics, 2024, vol 56, 165-182
Relocalization.pdf
 
DOES JURA NOVIT CURIA APPLY IN ARBITRATION? (with Olivier Caprasse, Éamonn Conlon, Alejandro Escobar and Affef Ben Mansour), ICC Bullettin 2023 issue 3, pp. 53-61 2023-3 PP_Does Jura Novit Curia Apply in Arbitration.pdf
 
IRMA MIGNON 100 ÅR: TILBAKE TIL RØTTENE, Jussens Venner, 2023, pp. 343-363, JV_Irma_Mignon.pdf
 
DÉVELOPPEMENTS RÉCENTS DANS LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ NORVÉGIEN, Travaux du Comité Français de Droit International Privé 2020-2022, Pedone 2023, pp. 1-18 Comite_Fr_DIP.pdf
 
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE NORWEGIAN TRANSPARENCY ACT: THE IMPORTANCE OF CHOICE OF LAW, in G. Cordero-Moss (ed.), Special Issue on Corporate Social Responsibility, Oslo Law Review vol 10 2024, pp. 1-14 https://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/olr.10.2.7
 
ER SONDRINGEN MELLOM INNSATS- OG RESULTATFORPLIKTELSER NYTTIG?, Jussens Venner, 4/21, pp. 267-298
 https://uio-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/giudittm_uio_no/EZtkOZFVcmZEsC1oUWChKhgBvIyBjb15rR1NI8GaWgEgiw?e=Lvy5lZ        
 
DEN INDIVIDUALISERENDE METODE I MANGEL AV FASTE LOVVALGSREGLER – ILLUSTRERT MED LOVVALGET FOR DIREKTEKRAV MOT FORSIKRINGSSELSKAP, Tidsskrift for forretningsjus, 2021, 1, 22-33
https://uio-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/giudittm_uio_no/Ef0mmhCX1T5HmW6K4wNkWW0BnIJtwjGWekcomAW8VUA8Eg?e=Ovk01y
 
COVID-19 AND FORCE MAJEURE UNDER THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON SALES AND IN CIVIL LAW, New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer (New York State Bar Association), 2020. Vol. 13, No. 2, 50-52
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kpg89m5xzu8yqr3/Force_Majeure_NYSBA_20.pdf?dl=0
 
THE IMPACT OF EU LAW ON NORWEGIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Iuridica, 2020, No. 4, 31–43
https://www.dropbox.com/s/q0qxwx10nwcwvra/EU_impact_on_Norwegian_IPR.pdf?dl=0
 
REASONS IN ARBITRAL AWARDS AND COURT CONTROL, Antonio Crivellaro and Mélida N. Hodgson (eds.), Dossier XVIII: Explaining why you lost: Reasoning in Arbitration, ICC Institute of World Business, 2020, 93-122
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7zvuavdoxqw0fyv/Reasoning_ICC.pdf?dl=0
 
ACHMEA’S DISTINCTION BETWEEN INVESTMENT AND COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION, The Future of Arbitration in Europe - Stockholm Centre for Commercial Law Skriftserie, 36, 2020, 17-28
https://www.dropbox.com/s/20fdqc8sxroz6zg/SCC_Achmea.pdf?dl=0
 
INTERNASJONALT VERNETING I FORMUERETTSLIGE FORHOLD: FORHOLDET MELLOM TVISTELOVN § 4-3 OG DE ØVRIGE VERNETINGSREGLER I TVISTELOVEN, Jussens Venner 2019, 277-300
https://www.dropbox.com/s/48bmi97gl4ze00x/Internasjonalt%20verneting%20-%20jv-2019-6-01.pdf?dl=0
 
ORDRE PUBLIC AND ARBITRATION IN NORWAY, MarIus 2019, No 515, pp.126-153
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f3f3zi4aslzdt2r/Marius_515_ordre_public_Norway_web.pdf?dl=0
 
TOWARDS A NORWEGIAN CODIFICATION OF CHOICE OF LAW RULES, Oslo Law Review, 2019, vol I, pp. 4-7 https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zpbsxec0pj9qpiq/towards_a_norwegian_codification_of_choice-of-law_rules.pdf?dl=0
 
THE EFFECTS OF THE AWARD FOR THE CONTROLLING COURTS, Rivista dell’Arbitrato, 2019, pp. 257-272
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zxvx8oovy3frqf7/Effects_Awards.pdf?dl=0
SOFT LAW AS A REPLACEMENT OR CORRECTIVE OF NATIONAL LAW IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION?, European International Arbitration Review, Volume 7:2, 2019, pp. 201-216
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7n8fcjb04jd17pb/12-cordero-moss_soft_law_eiar_v7_n2.pdf?dl=0
INHERENT POWERS AND COMPETITION LAW, European International Arbitration Review, 2017, vol 6.2, pp. 69-94
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vv401i8whucm6z6/eiar_vol_6_no_2-06-corder-moss-competition_inherent_powers.pdf?dl=0
 
Republished in:
Franco Ferrari and Friedrich Rosenfeld (eds.), INHERENT POWERS IN INTERNASTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 2018, pp. 297-325
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fqy8lhala7trxyu/ipa-11-corder-moss-competition_inherent_powers%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0
 
 
SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LOCAL LAW FOR ENERGY CONTRACTS – THE EXAMPLE OF NORWEGIAN LAW, European Investment Law and Arbitration Review, 2017, pp. 258-276
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l9nseozl4bpa6cj/Energy_Law_Norway.pdf?dl=0
 
THE IMPORTANCE OF LEGAL CULTURE FOR CONTRACT CONTRUCTION: NORWEGIAN LAW, ENGLISH LAW AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer (New York State Bar Association) 2017, No 1, pp. 39-41
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jtlokev32uhcgyt/LegalCulture.pdf?dl=0
 
ULIKE TREKK VED NORSK OG ENGELSK KONTRAKTSRETT OG DERES BETYDNING FOR KONTRAKTENS VIRKNINGER – NOEN KOMPARATIVRETTSLIGE BETRAKTNINGER, Jussens Venner 2016 vol. 51, pp. 276-302
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jgmmelq7d53czi1/norsk_engelsk_kontraktsrett.pdf?dl=0
 
NON-NATIONAL SOURCES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND THE HIDDEN INFLUENCE BY NATIONAL TRADITIONS, Scandinavian Studies in Law 2016, vol 63, pp. 23-44
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6r1mo2jnpl4ifd1/ScSt63.pdf?dl=0
 
REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: A DILEMMA OF PHILOSOPHICAL CHARACTER?, Scandinavian Studies in Law 2016, vol 62, pp. 281-296
https://www.dropbox.com/s/44i91qt7omoko5i/ScSt62.pdf?dl=0
 
ER DOMSTOLSBEHANDLING I FERD MED Å BLI MER ATTRAKTIV FOR INTERNASJONALE TVISTER?, Lov og Rett 2016, vol. 4, pp. 236-244
 
LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION, Oslo Law Review, 2014 (https://www.journals.uio.no/index.php/oslawreview/article/view/979)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ialmpejerqz9ua/ERUIO-1.pdf?dl=0
 
Republished in:
Penn State Journal of law and international affairs, 2015, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 47-66
 
THE RELEVANCE OF THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION (together with Daniel Behn), Uniform Law Review - Revue de droit uniforme 2014, volume 19, issue 4, pp. 570-608.  (http://ulr.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/4/570.abstract )
 
Republished in:
Diritto del Commercio Internazionale, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 3-46
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8bhzrk3hujtvvfy/UPICC_Investment.pdf?dl=0
 
INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: DIVERSITY ON MORE THAN ONE LEVEL, European Review of Private Law, 1-2014, pp. 13-36
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6mfewu2p0bij2rb/ERPL_22-1_Giuditta%20Cordero-Moss.pdf?dl=0
 
INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS, ENGLISH CLAUSES AND NORWEGIAN GOVERNING LAW, MarIus 418, 2013, pp. 63-138
 
NEW TRENDS IN THE NORWEGIAN PRACTICE ON CHOICE OF LAW APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS, Scandinavian studies in law, 2012, vol 57, pp. 45-61
https://www.dropbox.com/s/r1yvice5hoj5dw6/ScStL57.pdf?dl=0
 
REVISION OF THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES: FURTHER STEPS, International Arbitration Law Review, 2010, Issue 3, pp. 96-99
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3w75qil99qmp91q/Revision_UNCITRAL.pdf?dl=0
 
LOVVALG OG JURISDIKSJON FOR KONTRAKTER OM SALG AV FAST EIENDOM – OG NOEN BEMERKNINGER OM ANDRE KONTRAKTER MED TINGSRETTSLIGE VIRKNINGER, Jussens Venner, 2010, Vol. 45, Issue 5, pp. 295-322
 
EN MER MODERN OG SYSTEMATISK NORSK INTERNASJONAL PRIVATRETT ETTER BOKHANDLEREN I KABUL-DOMMEN, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 2010, pp. 819-842
 
INNFØRING I LOVVALG FOR KJØPSKONTRAKTER, Jussens Venner, 2010, Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 85-97
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sowa2linig39ris/Lovvalg_for_Kj%C3%B8pskontrakter.pdf?dl=0
 
LOVVALG I INTERNASJONAL KOMMERSIELL VOLDGIFT, Lov og Rett, 2009, Vol. 48 Issue 6, pp. 361-373
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sp97ab6q2z120pf/Lovvalg%20og%20voldgift.pdf?dl=0
 
DEN NYE EUROPEISKE INTERNASJONALE FORMUERETTEN OG NORSK INTERNASJONAL FORMUERETT, Lov og Rett, 2009, Vol. 48 Issue 2, pp. 67-83
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ucieugnmqjys6x/Roma%20I%20og%20II.pdf?dl=0
 
THE “TROIKA” AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE HARMONISATION OF CONTRACT LAW –ILLUSTRATED BY THE DUTY OF GOOD FAITH BETWEEN THE PARTIES, (2009) Transnational Dispute Management, Vol. 6 Issue 1, pp. 2-21
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1f4rl9l3khvwauf/Troika.pdf?dl=0
 
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND THE QUEST FOR THE APPLICABLE LAW, (2008) Global Jurist: Vol. 8: Iss. 3 (Advances), Article 2 pp.1-42
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j3dfv4gnbeyg49l/Quest%20for%20applicable%20law.pdf?dl=0
 
ARBITRATION AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, [2008] International Arbitration Law Review, Vol 11 Issue 4, pp. 153-164
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ltrtc6eithzsjkb/Arbitration%20and%20PIL.pdf?dl=0
 
LOVVALGSREGLER FOR INTERNASJONALE KONTRAKTER: TILSYNELATENDE LIKHETER OG REELLE FORSKJELLER MELLOM EUROPEISKE OG NORSKE REGLER, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 2007, pp. 679-717
https://www.dropbox.com/s/usyte5ugp7tpqf3/europeiske%20og%20norske%20lovvalgsregler.pdf?dl=0
 
FORM OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS: CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN UNCITRAL AND THE WRITING REQUIREMENT OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 18/2, 2007, pp. 51-63
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4j1adtx433r8mrs/Form%20arb%20clause%20ICC.pdf?dl=0
 
Republished in:
International Commercial Arbitration Review, Moscow, No 2, 2011
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vzqmxp0kj2gkfxm/Russian_Form%20of%20arbitration%20agreements.pdf?dl=0
 
EXORBITANT JURISDICTION BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW, Review of Central and East European Law 32 (2007) 1-17
https://www.dropbox.com/s/htx3h054ug42ksl/ExorbitantJurisdiction.pdf?dl=0
 
IS THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL BOUND BY THE PARTIES’ FACTUAL AND LEGAL PLEADINGS?,  Stockholm International Arbitration Review, 2006:3, pp. 1-25
https://www.dropbox.com/s/tgektcynrob3n0k/Binding%20Pleadings.pdf?dl=0
 
Republished in:
International Commercial Arbitration Review, Moscow, No 1, 2014
 
 INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS BETWEEN COMMON LAW AND CIVIL LAW: IS NON-STATE LAW TO BE PREFERRED? THE DIFFICULTY OF INTERPRETING LEGAL STANDARDS SUCH AS GOOD FAITH,  (2007) Global Jurist: Vol. 7: Iss. 1 (Advances), Article 3 pp.1-38
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z9eazvh7y0st80m/Non-state%20Law_Good%20Faith.pdf?dl=0
 
CAN AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL DISREGARD THE CHOICE OF LAW MADE BY THE PARTIES? Stockholm International Arbitration Review, 2005:1, pp. 1-21
https://www.dropbox.com/s/51yrwq3zfobrscv/Disregard%20of%20choice%20of%20law.pdf?dl=0
 
Contribution to the Nordic Group for Private International Law’s answer to the European Commission’s Green Paper on the conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations into a Community Instrument and its modernisation, September 2003 (contributions on the law governing choice of forum clauses, arbitration agreements and contracts in the absence of a choice of law made by the parties),  pp. 10
 
RISK OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE NEW YORK CONVENTION AND NEWER ARBITRATION-FRIENDLY NATIONAL LEGISLATION?, Stockholm Arbitration Report, 2003/2, pp.1-17
https://www.dropbox.com/s/02vhs4hghpfgfxp/Form%20of%20arbitration%20clause.pdf?dl=0
 
Republished in:
International Commercial Arbitration, Moscow, No 4, 2005
 
NATIONAL RULES ON ARBITRABILITY AND THE VALIDITY OF AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARD: THE EXAMPLE OF DISPUTES REGARDING RUSSIAN PETROLEUM INVESTMENTS, Stockholm Arbitration Report, 2001, pp.7-24
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xfafgkefkeeandq/Arbitrability.pdf?dl=0
 
PETROLEUM INVESTMENTS IN RUSSIA: ARE THERE GROUNDS FOR REVISING THE PREFERENCE FOR PRODUCTION SHARING?, Yearbook of the Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law, 2000, pp. 217-231 and in to be published in Atti del Primo Convegno sul Diritto Minerario, Universita’ di Roma, 2000, [pp.12]
 
PERFORMANCE OF THE OBLIGATION AS BASIS FOR JURISDICTION AND CHOICE OF LAW IN EUROPEAN CONTRACTS, Scandinavian Journal of International Law, 2000, pp. 379-396
 
LOVVALG I KONTRAKSFORHOLD: NORSK RETTS ASKEPOTT SLÅR TILBAKE? [Choice of the law applicable to contractual obligations: is the Cindrella of Norwegian law gaining importance?], Jussens venner, 2000, pp. 132-152
 
JURISDIKSJON OG LOVVALG FOR EUROPEISKE KONTRAKTER [Jurisdiction and Choice of Law for European Contracts], Lov og Rett, 2000, 131-147
 
A COMPARISON OF ITALIAN, ENGLISH AND NORWEGIAN INHERITANCE RULES AS AN ILLUSTRATION OF DIFFERENT LEGAL METHODS, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 1999, 884-903
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vjt1i1cdgr72jn2/Comparison%20of%20Legal%20Method.pdf?dl=0
 
CONSULENZA LEGALE OCCIDENTALE AI PAESI IN TRANSIZIONE: L’ESEMPIO DELLA NORMATIVA RUSSA SUGLI INVESTIMENTI PETROLIFERI [Western Legal Advice to Countries in Transition: the Example of the Russian Legislation on Petroleum Investments], Diritto del Commercio Internazionale, 1999, 2, 373-397
 
CONTRACT OR LICENCE? REGULATION OF PETROLEUM INVESTMENT IN RUSSIA AND FOREIGN LEGAL ADVICE,  Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 1998, pp. 186-199;
https://www.dropbox.com/s/heegsep4j72r7fk/Russian%20PSA.pdf?dl=0
 
Winner of the Willoughby Prize 1998
 
RUSSIAN LEGISLATION AND FOREIGN MODELS. SOME OBSERVATIONS ON COMPARATIVE LAW, Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 1997, 4, pp. 1-26, and Europa e Diritto Privato, 1998, pp. 523-550
https://www.dropbox.com/s/tdhz90tg5aqtl5s/Rusian%20law%20and%20comparative%20law.pdf?dl=0
 
NASJONAL SUVERENITET, LEX MERCATORIA OG INTERNASJONAL VOLDGIFT [National sovereignity, law merchant and international arbitration], Internasjonal Politikk, 1995, 3, pp. 381-398
 
PETROLEUM LEGISLATION IN RUSSIA - DRAFT PSA LAW APPROVED IN THE FIRST READING, Survey of Eastern European Law, 1995, 4, pp. 11-13
 
DRAFT RUSSIAN LAW ON PRODUCTION SHARING AGREEMENTS TO GIVE NEEDED LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO PETROLEUM INVESTMENTS?, Survey of Eastern European Law, 1995, 1, pp. 5-11
 
LA POSIZIONE DELL'OFFESO DAL REATO NEL PROCESSO PENALE: UNA RECENTE RIFORMA DELLA REPUBBLICA FEDERALE TEDESCA ED IL NOSTRO NUOVO CODICE [The victim of a crime: recent reforms in the German system and the Italian draft code of criminal procedure], Cassazione Penale, 1989, 6, pp. 1115-1130
 
OLTRE AL PATTEGGIAMENTO PER I REATI BAGATELLARI? LA LIMITATA DISCREZIONALITA' DELL'AZIONE PENALE OPERANTE NELL'ORDINAMENTO TEDESCO-FEDERALE E IL NOSTRO ART. 112 COST. [Plea bargaining in German law and the Italian constitution], La legislazione penale, 1986, 3, pp. 658-669
 
RITO DIRETTISSIMO E NECESSITA' DI CONVALIDA DELL'ARRESTO IN FLAGRANZA [Immediate trial and confirmation of flagrancy arrest], Cassazione Penale, 1986, 2-3, pp. 311-316
 
ISTRUZIONE E IMMEDIATEZZA NELLA STRAFPROZESSORDNUNG DELLA REPUBBLICA FEDERALE TEDESCA [Preliminary investigations and oral evidence in the German code of criminal procedure], Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 1986, 1, pp. 118-143
 
LA TESTIMONIANZA NEL DIRITTO INGLESE [Witness evidence in English law],  Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 1985, 1, pp. 193-237
 
Case Notes, Editorials
 
LOVVALG FOR DIREKTEKRAV MOT FORSIKRINGSSELSKAPET – HR-2024-1117-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 3/2024
 
TOLKNING AV KONTRAKTSVILKÅR I INTERNASJONAL VOLDGIFT, Newsletter, Danish Institute of Arbitration, 28 September 2023
 
THE LAW COMMISSION PROPOSAL ON CHOICE OF THE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: A COMPARATIVE VIEW, EAPIL Blog, 13 September 2023
https://eapil.org/2023/09/13/online-symposium-on-the-law-governing-arbitration-agreements-a-view-from-oslo/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=new-contents-on-the-eapil-blog_2
 
 
PILOT EMPIRICAL PROJET ON CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACTS IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 1 August 2023
Pilot Empirical Project on Construction of Contracts in International Arbitration. - Kluwer Arbitration Blog
 
INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY: MYTHS AND REALITY, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 23 January 2023
INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY: MYTHS AND REALITY, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 23 January 2023 - Google-søk
 
LUGANOKONVENSJONEN, KONNEKSE KRAV – HR-2022-2132-U, Nytt i Privatretten, 1/2023
 
DOMSMYNDIGHET VED FORELDRETVISTER, TIDSPUNKTET FOR VURDERINGEN ETTER BARNELOVEN § 82 – HR-2022-847-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 2/2022
 
VANLIG BOSTED, TIDSPUNKTET FOR VURDERINGEN, NORSKE MYNDIGHETERS JURISDIKSJON TIL Å BEHANDLE SAK OM OMSORGSOVERTAGELSE, HAAGKONVENSJONEN AV 1996 – HR-2022-207-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 1/2022
 
DEN NORSKE RETTSORDEN (ORDRE PUBLIC), FAMILIEGJENFORENING OG BARNEEKTESKAP - HØYESTERETTS KJENNELSE HR-2021-1345-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 3/2021, pp.
 
LOVVALG FOR KRAV OM OPPREISNINGSERSTATNING KNYTTET TIL STRAFFBARE FORHOLD. HØYESTERETTS KJENNELSE HR-2021-995-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 2/2021, pp. 17-19
 
INTERNASJONALT VERNETING. DOMSMYNDIGHET I ARVETVIST UNDER PRIVAT SKIFTE. HØYESTERETTS KJENNELSE HR-2021-291-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 2/2021, pp. 16-17
 
VERNETING FOR KRAV KNYTTET TIL KONKURS - OMFANGET AV KONKURSUNNTAKET I LUGANOKONVENSJONEN. HØYESTERETT KJENNELSE HR-2018-869-A (ALPHA INSURANCE), Nytt i Privatretten, 1/2021, pp.
 
IN MEMORIAM MARCO WEIGMANN, ICC Dispute Resolution Bullettin, 3/2020, p. 13.
 
EARLY DISMISSAL AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION IN EXPEDITED ARBITRATION?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, ITA, 20 September 2020
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xf3przjlv7x2g2q/UNCITRAL%20Working%20Group%20II_%20Early%20Dismissal%20and%20Preliminary%20Determination%20in%20Expedited%20Arbitration_%20-%20Kluwer%20Arbitration%20Blog.pdf?dl=0
 
COVID-19 OG TVISTELØSNING. ER VOLDGIFT MER EFFEKTIV ENN DOMSTOLSBEHANDLING?, Lov og Rett, 2020, vol. 7, pp. 389-390
 
VERNETING FOR DIREKTEKRAV MOT FORSIKRINGSSELSKAPER. HØYESTERETT KJENNELSER HR-2018-869-A (STOLT COMMITMENT 1) OG HR-2020-1328-A (STOLT COMMITMENT 2), Nytt i Privatretten, 3/2020, pp. 15-17
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gexhhwv1sqdaywh/Vernetig_direktekrav_NIP_20.pdf?dl=0
 
NY HAAGKONVENSJON OM SIVILE DOMMER, Lov og Rett, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
 
ARBEID MED FORENKLET VOLDGIFT, Lov og Rett, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
 
MOT EN NY LOV OM LOVVALG?, Lov og Rett, 2018, vol. 9, pp.
 
WHY ARBITRATION NEEDS CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, ITA, 17 October 2018
 
HØYESTERETTS ULIKE TILNÆRMINGER TIL INTERNASJONALT VERNETING, Lov og Rett, 2018, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
 
PANT OVER LANDEGRENSER OG DOMSMYNDIGHET; LOVVALG FOR
PANT I FORDRINGER. HØYESTERETTS DOM HR-2017-1297-A, Nytt i Privatretten, 2017, vol. 3
 
POTENSIALE FOR FORENKLING AV TVISTELOVENS REGEL OM OPPFYLLELSESVERNETING, Lov og Rett, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
 
UNIDROIT PRINSIPPENES 4. UTGAVE, Nytt i Privatretten 2016, vol. 3 pp. 10-11
 
REVISJON AV LUGANOKONVENSJONEN?, Lov og Rett, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
 
INTERNASJONALT ARBEID MED VOLDGIFT, Lov og Rett, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
 
EØS-RETTENS INDIREKTE BETYDNING FOR NORSK JURIDISK METODE, Lov og Rett, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
NYE MULIGHETER FOR SPESIALISERING I JUSSTUDIET, Lov og Rett, 2013, vol. 7, pp. 1-2
NORSKE DOMSTOLERS STEDLIGE KOMPETANSE. LUGANOKONVENSJONEN – HØYESTERETTSKJENNELSE – HR-2012-02393-A, Nytt i Privatretten, I/13, pp. 15-17
 
BEHOV FOR KODIFISERING AV DEN INTERNASJONALE PRIVATRETTEN, Lov og Rett, 2013, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
EUROPEISK OG NORSK KONTRAKTSRETT I UTAKT?, Lov og Rett, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 1-2
LOV OG RETT – 50 ÅR, Lov og Rett, 2011, Issue 50, vol. 1-2, pp. 1-3
LOVVALG I ERSTATNINGSRETT – PERSONLIGHETSKRENKELSE – YTRINGSFRIHET – HØYESTERETT DOM 2. DESEMBER 2009 (hr-2009-02266-A), Nytt i Privatretten, I/2010
LOVVALG I ERSTATNINGSRETT – PERSONLIGHETSKRENKELSE – YTRINGSFRIHET - BORGATING LAGMANNSRETT DOM 20. APRIL 2009 (LB-2009-28508) [Choice of law in non contractual obligations – defamation – freedom of speech – Court of Appeal Decision], Nytt i Privatretten, III/2009
FORKNINGSPROSJEKT OM LOVVALGSKLAUSULER OG DERES BEGRENSINGER [Research project on choice of law clauses and their limitations], Nytt i Privatretten, II/2009
LUGANOKONVENSJONEN – VERNETING  – KONTRAKTSBRUDD – HØYESTERETTS KJÆREMÅLSUTVALGS KJENNELSE 25. SEPTEMBER 2008 (HR-2008-1651-U) [Lugano Convention – choice of forum for breach of contract – Supreme Court decision] , Nytt i Privatretten, I/2009
NYE EF-FORORDNINGER OM LOVVALG [New European Regulations on choice of law], Nytt i Privatretten, IV/2008
FORSKNINGSPROSJEKT OM ENGELSKE KONTRAKTSMODELLER OG NORSK BAKGRUNNSRETT  [Research Project on English Contract Models and Norwegian Governing Law], Nytt i Privatretten, III/2008
NORSK FORENING FOR KOMPARATIV RETT [Norwegian Association of Comparative Law], Nytt i Privatretten, IV/2007
 
UNCITRAL – ARBEIDSGRUPPE OM VOLDGIFT [UNCITRAL – Working Group on Arbitration], Nytt i Privatretten, IV/2007
 
LOVVALG I AGENTAVTALE – NÆRMESTE TILKNYTNING –REALDEBITORS BOPEL-HØYESTERETTSKJENNELSE [Choice of law in agency agreement – closest connection – residence of the party making the characteristic performance], Nytt i Privatretten, IV/2006, pp. 16-17
 
VERNETING OG LOVVALG VED SKADELIDTES DIREKTE SØKSMÅL MOT FORSIKRINGSSELSKAP – HØYESTERETTSKJENNELSE [Choice of Forum and Choice of Law for Direct Action against the Insurer], Nytt i Privatretten, II/2002, pp. 13-15
 
NOU 2001:33 – Lov om Voldgift [Comments on the Bill on Arbitration], Nytt i Privatretten, II/2002, pp. 15-16
 
CESSIONE DEL CONTRATTO E AUTONOMIA DELLA CLAUSOLA ARBITRALE: UNA DISCUTIBILE DECISIONE DEL TRIBUNALE DI MOSCA [Assignment of a contract and separability of the arbitration clause: a decision by the Moscow Courts which raises some doubts], Rivista dell’Arbitrato, 2000, pp.499-508
 
TVANGSFULLBYRDELSE AV UTENLANDSKE VOLDGIFTSAVGJØRELSER [Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards], Nytt i Privatretten, 2000, 1, pp. 15-16